September 8, 2008
Have you registered to vote?
I am always amazed when I meet a woman—young or old—who tells me she doesn’t vote in local or national elections. I know it is easy to be disenfranchised these days. But it is really important that you register to vote and then follow it up by actually casting a vote.
According to the U.S. Census, women are 51 percent of the population, and with this majority voice we can influence the direction of critical policies important to us — like childcare, choice, personal safety and economic security, and a healthy environment.
Women are not effectively exercising their hard-earned constitutional right. Twenty-two million registered unmarried women did not vote in the last election. And more than 50 million eligible women — married and unmarried — are not even registered to vote.
Too busy to register to vote? The WVWV Voter Registration Application gives you a fast and easy way to register to vote online.
Why are so many women are leaving it up to men to decide how to run this country? Leave a comment and let me know your thoughts.
Barbara Lanz-Mateo
Publisher
Leave a Comment » |
Publisher Speaks |
Permalink
Posted by Barbara Lanz-Mateo
September 2, 2008
Am I the only one who sees the irony in that the Republican convention kicked off the day Hurricane Gustav hit New Orleans?
Barbara Lanz-Mateo
Publisher, Coastal Woman
1 Comment |
Publisher Speaks |
Permalink
Posted by Barbara Lanz-Mateo
August 4, 2008
Surely you’ve read about them. Purity Balls, where fathers and daughters dress up like they’re going to

Purity Ball
prom together. They dance. They chat. And then the dads recite their covenant before God to be their daughters’ authority and protection in the area of purity [read: virginity].
According to Wikipedia: “A Purity Ball (also known as a “Father Daughter Purity Ball” or “Purity Wedding”) is a is a formal event attended by fathers and their daughters. These events promote virginity until marriage for teenaged girls, and are often closely associated with U.S. Christian churches, particularly evangelical Christian churches.”
The story I read in the July 17 issue of Time described the attendees of one “purity wedding” thusly: “The girls generally range in age from college down to the tiny 4-year-old dressed all in purple who has climbed up into her father’s arms to be carried.”

I promise Daddy...
Am I the only one who thinks this is just disgusting? I can’t type my horrified thoughts as fast as I have them: You mean if she has sex before marriage she is impure? A 4-year-old at a ball promising to stay
pure for daddy? How about a 9-year-old girl? What the heck do they know about sex? And why in the world would you sexualize a little girl anyway? Does this make his little daughter his property until he decides who is right to take her virginity?
I don’t have any issues with parents teaching their values to their children. But does anyone else find the idea of daddy and daughter engaged in a “purity wedding” just a tad sickening?
Finally, where are the boys in all this? Sowing their wild oats?
5 Comments |
Publisher Speaks |
Permalink
Posted by Barbara Lanz-Mateo